Tech Information

Archive for June, 2011

not to do thorough investigations of different media for the detection of this failure to provide. Look how the sport is managed, greater range in various media in recent decades, vis-à-vis profit of science. One could argue that this is because there is always some sports events around the world, of course, the media attention. But the contention here that can scientific activity, the scientific community and laboratories around the world into “media events” will be converted to be called when the pain is quite taken by the science communicators in order to maintain this status for science. First, it is the optimal cooperation between scientists.

as birthdays of scientists, institutions, organizations and businesses, including the World Health Day, etc., can be celebrated, discussions and debates with the scientists involved were organized, and the doors of the participating laboratories and organizations have been opened to the masses and media .

Anyway, for by this article is that the essential elements and limitations of popular science highlight, it seems a fundamental change in how you look at this issue. Hopefully this will lead to popularize science to more efficient strategies among the masses.

Science Writing is an art

popular science is carried out primarily by people with scientific training and professional scientists. It is therefore considered more than a scientific activity rather than anything else. But science writing is more art than science. It is scientific in the sense that we should have scientific evidence, but all writing skills are needed to make a good representation of science. It is because of the current deficiencies in the artistic aspect of the popularization of science, that this activity does. The few scientists or scientifically trained people who, consciously or unconsciously, the art of writing was known and practiced science, have only managed to popularize science.

science is a human activity

The second reason why popular science not check not with the masses because it is not as a human activity but an activity of scientists who simply believe in the quest intended for truth – and nothing but the truth! The human side of science is completely neglected in all presentations of popular science. The follies and prejudices of the scientists, the emotional life of scientists, is the circumstances under which the work done often irrational and scientific discoveries and inventions, etc., are often unaware show fear, it would be a bad name give science and scientific research. In short, the human face of science or scientific research is often overlooked in popular representations. So there is a strong need to give, science a human face. It would mean not only by talking human stories in popular science lectures, but also about the realities of scientific research.

Council presentation iceberg

The third reason why popular science lectures are often far from the truth and publish the yawning and looking for something else is the inability of science communicators between different technical reports and popular science writing with their scientific training or background. You try to cram in a presentation of popular science as they learn or know about a topic.

In fact, should be the presentation of popular science as the tip of the iceberg. However, it should not only take note of the tip of the iceberg, but hover about the most invisible of the iceberg in the water. In other words, it must show something about science, but enough to make an account for the existence of this science, with its branching set. It must be curious enough that we continue to awaken in this science. It does not necessarily need a science but at the same time we must not miss science.

Some important observations

author’s experience with the popularization of science over the years has been forced to come up with assumptions. They are simply based on experience and intuition. All research was not carried out in order to support them with facts and figures. In fact, much research is needed to confirm or refute. If in case they are established, they can be easily retrieved “laws of popular science” because, despite our efforts, we have not been able to science as we popularize among the masses. It should be hidden laws of our efforts to popularize science. These assumptions are specified as follows:

Assumptions

popular science

1.

: Only members of the scientific attention in a society fit their goals or the fear

inspire.
2.

: A science communicator tends to limit his vision of science, scientists and scientific research on the public

impose.

3: The amount of space allocated to mean is the science in various media of a country an indication of the quality of life for its citizens

.
4.

: The quality of science communication, or presented in a country produces is directly proportional to the quality of science in it

.
5.

: To popularize science is the science

humanize.

can see certain things from these assumptions. The first assumption suggests that people read the great science, because it serves their purposes, either because the topic is timely, sensational or controversial, or simply excited their curiosity. Read only a handful of science for the sake of knowledge itself. Much of the research is necessary to identify the themes, allowing science to be more popular. For example, fascinate health sciences and environmental interests in a broad sense, astronomy and space them Nobel laureates, UFOs, etc., are kept in check by them.

The second assumption is dangerous for science. Consciously or unconsciously, absorb the secular image of the limited or narrow science, scientists and the culture of science from the communicator, whether Jacob Bronowski Peter Medawar. Concepts such as scientists are people going crazy or scientific research is another profession are creations of science communication. This is a science communicator very responsible person.

third and fourth postulates intuitive two independent things or activities. Further research is needed to confirm or refute these two laws by data from different countries. However, we have to add that increase in India, we raise a fuss about science reporting in the media at the first available opportunity, but it often comes to nothing. Even when writing a popular science article on a topic often need the help of a scientist conducting research in this topic. But in India is the scientific discipline concerned often for advice and as a result of our fonts have available the necessary quality, verve and color.

fifth, not least important postulate, if obvious, reminder that we give science a human face so that the masses do not fear him. It is the fundamental objective of popularizing science.

Christmas tree of science extension

The purpose of drawing “the Christmas tree from Popular Science” is the importance of the various media that the science, the masses have illustrated, although each medium has its own significance and an important role to play in communication. But if a person climbs the tree, as his interest in science is excited or more – in other words, if we start from newspapers, magazines and books to read -. He or she would not read in full science

have

is necessary, the proportion of people who read books would be very low, since the tip is to read a Christmas tree. But it is important to know that tree, because the role of media should not be underestimated and should make every effort to give equal importance simultaneously. For example, if student interest in science is driven by science or just “Jatha held in the city, it has supported and maintained by wallpaper, newspapers and books, if not his interest is not loose and eventually die complete. Other media should be made available to students through the public libraries, for example. This extension of the Christmas tree of science should be cared for carefully to read a scientific society and write.

Conclusion

After the postulates here (yet unknown) limits to the extent that science is sent popular among the masses. It is not possible, a fully literate society, science. Science communicators should also take into account the above aspects of the popularization of science for more efficient communication of science to the masses.

configuring a wireless network to a wireless router or access point and wireless adapter installed on the computer to establish the network. The wireless router must be placed in a central location because the computers closer faster to the router or access point obtain network speeds. The wireless router must be connected to a power source and a source of Internet connectivity to all networked computers access the Internet.

A wireless router is not required to set up a wireless network. Almost any computer with a wireless adapter and a cable connection to the Internet can be used as an access point. Then the wireless network must be given a name. This is called the SSID. All the computers on a wireless LAN must use the same SSID

Any computer with the wireless network needs a wireless card (also known as

You can also automatic wireless configuration, the IEEE 802.11 wireless networks opt supported. This minimizes the required configuration to the wireless network access. Once the automatic configuration of the wireless network on your computer, between different networks can without reconfiguring the settings of the network connection to move. If you move from one place another move, automatically searches for a wireless network is available and inform you about the same. You can choose to connect the network you want and Updates Wizard network configuration of your wireless adapter to the access point can match the new network.